↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety and depressive disorders in elderly with chronic dizziness of vestibular origin

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anxiety and depressive disorders in elderly with chronic dizziness of vestibular origin
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.04.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Érica Toledo Piza Peluso, Maria Inês Quintana, Fernando Freitas Ganança

Abstract

Dizziness is one of the most prevalent symptoms in the elderly. Anxiety and depression are common in dizzy adult patients, but there is scarce information about comorbidity between vestibular disturbances and psychiatric disorders in the aged. To assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders in elderly with chronic dizziness of vestibular origin. Transversal study that used the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 2.1 to assess anxiety and depressive disorders in elderly patients (≥60 years old) with chronic dizziness. Most of the 44 patients included in the study were female (88.6%) with a mean age of 71 years (±7.5), 68.1% had experienced dizziness for 1 year or more. The most prevalent diagnosis was benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (52.3%). The prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder and specific phobias during life were 29.5% and 22.7%, respectively, and, in the last 12 months, 18.2% and 15.9%. There was no patient with panic disorder, agoraphobia or social phobia. The prevalence of depressive disorder during life was 45.4%, and, in the last 12 months, were 11.3%. Aged patients with chronic dizziness had high prevalence of some mental disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Psychology 9 10%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#501
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,011
of 290,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#115
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.