↓ Skip to main content

Ophthalmic complications of endoscopic sinus surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ophthalmic complications of endoscopic sinus surgery
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malgorzata Seredyka-Burduk, Pawel Krzysztof Burduk, Malgorzata Wierzchowska, Bartlomiej Kaluzny, Grazyna Malukiewicz

Abstract

The proximity of the paranasal sinuses to the orbit and its contents make the possibilities of injury both in primary or revision surgery. The majority of orbital complications are minor. The major ones are seen in 0.01-2.25% and some of them could be serious, leading to permanent dysfunction. The aim of this study was to find the risk and type of ophthalmic complications among patients operated because of chronic rhinosinusitis. We performed a retrospective study of 1658 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps or mucocele. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia in all cases and consisted of polyps' removal, followed by middle metal antrostomy, partial or complete ethmoidectomy, frontal recess surgery and sphenoid surgery if necessary. The ophthalmic complications were matched with type, frequency and clinical findings. In our material 32.68% of the patients required revision surgery and only 10.1% had been done previously in our Department. Overall complications occurred in 11 patients (0.66%). A minor complications was observed in 5 patients (0.3%) with the most frequent being periorbital ecchymosis with or without emphysema. Major ones were observed in one patient (0.06%) and were referred to lacrimal duct injury. A serious complication occurred in 5 cases (0.3%) and referred to retroorbital hematoma (2 cases), optic nerve injury (2 cases) and one case of extraocular muscle injury. Orbital complications of endoscopic nasal surgery are rare. The incidence of serious complications, causing permanent disabilities is less than 0.3%. The most important parameters responsible for complications are extension of the disease, previous endoscopic surgery and coexisting anticoagulant treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#574
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,751
of 312,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.