↓ Skip to main content

Can we use the questionnaire SNOT-22 as a predictor for the indication of surgical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis?

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can we use the questionnaire SNOT-22 as a predictor for the indication of surgical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis?
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.05.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Pinillos Marambaia, Manuela Garcia Lima, Marina Barbosa Guimarães, Amaury de Machado Gomes, Melina Pinillos Marambaia, Otávio Marambaia dos Santos, Leonardo Marques Gomes

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent disease that has a negative impact on the lives of sufferers. SNOT-22 is considered the most appropriate questionnaire for assessing the quality of life (QOL) of these patients and a very effective method of evaluating therapeutic interventions; however it is not used as a tool for decision-making. To test the hypothesis that the SNOT-22 score can predict the outcome of surgical treatment. A retrospective, longitudinal and analytical study. We evaluated the medical records of patients with CRS that completed the SNOT-22 at the time of diagnosis. All the patients were consecutively receiving care at an otolaryngology service in Salvador, Bahia from August 2011 to June 2012. The outcomes of the surgical treatment of these patients were obtained from their medical records. The initial score was compared to a group of patients who were not referred for surgery. All the patients completed and signed a consent form. Of the 88 patients with CRS, 26 had evolved to surgery over the last 3 years. The groups were homogeneous regarding gender and respiratory and medication allergies. The patients of the surgical group were 44.8+13.8 years old and the patients of the clinical group were 38.2+12.5 years old (p=0.517). The average SNOT-22 score of the case group was 49+19 and the average score of the control group was 49+27 (p=0.927). The SNOT-22 was unable to predict the outcome of surgical patients with CRS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#574
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,421
of 368,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.