↓ Skip to main content

Temporomandibular disorder: otologic implications and its relationship to sleep bruxism

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporomandibular disorder: otologic implications and its relationship to sleep bruxism
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Gama Magalhães, Jaciel Leandro de Melo Freitas, André Cavalcanti da Silva Barbosa, Maria Cecília Scheidegger Neves Gueiros, Simone Guimarães Farias Gomes, Aronita Rosenblatt, Arnaldo de França Caldas Júnior

Abstract

Temporomandibular disorder is an umbrella term for various clinical problems affecting the muscles of mastication, temporomandibular joint and associated structures. This disorder has a multifactor etiology, with oral parafunctional habits considered an important co-factor. Among such habits, sleep bruxism is considered a causal agent involved in the initiation and/or perpetuation of temporomandibular disorder. That condition can result in pain otologic symptoms. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between temporomandibular disorder and both otologic symptoms and bruxism. A total of 776 individuals aged 15 years or older from urban areas in the city of Recife (Brazil) registered at Family Health Units were examined. The diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder was determined using Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for temporomandibular disorders, addressing questions concerning myofascial pain and joint problems (disk displacement, arthralgia, osteoarthritis and osteoarthrosis). Four examiners had previously undergone training and calibration exercises for the administration of the instrument. Intra-examiner and inter-examiner agreement was determined using the Kappa statistic. Individuals with a diagnosis of at least one of these conditions were classified as having temporomandibular disorder. The diagnosis of otologic symptoms and bruxism was defined using the same instrument and a clinical exam. Among the individuals with temporomandibular disorder, 58.2% had at least one otologic symptom and 52% exhibited bruxism. Statistically significant associations were found between the disorder and both otologic symptoms and bruxism (p<0.01 for both conditions; OR=2.12 and 2.3 respectively). Otologic symptoms and bruxism maintained statistical significance in the binary logistic regression analysis, which demonstrated a 1.7 fold and twofold greater chance of such individuals have temporomandibular disorder, respectively. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated strong associations between the disorder and both otologic symptoms and bruxism when analyzed simultaneously, independently of patient age and gender.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 293 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 15%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 122 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 1%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 133 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#377
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,341
of 325,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.