You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic validity of methods for assessment of swallowing sounds: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.12.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Rosane Sampaio Santos, Bianca Lopes Cavalcante de Leão, José Stechman Neto, Leandro Pernambuco, Letícia Korb da Silva, Graziela De Luca Canto, André Luís Porporatti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,980,750
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#106
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,099
of 451,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.