You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to avoid the inappropriate use of antibiotics in upper respiratory tract infections? A position statement from an expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.02.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Otávio Bejzman Piltcher, Eduardo Macoto Kosugi, Eulalia Sakano, Olavo Mion, José Ricardo Gurgel Testa, Fabrizio Ricci Romano, Marco Cesar Jorge Santos, Renata Cantisani Di Francesco, Edson Ibrahim Mitre, Thiago Freire Pinto Bezerra, Renato Roithmann, Francini Greco Padua, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera, José Faibes Lubianca Neto, Leonardo Conrado Barbosa Sá, Shirley Shizue Nagata Pignatari, Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino, Juliana Alves de Souza Caixeta, Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima, Edwin Tamashiro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#575
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,436
of 343,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.