You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of the long-term quality of life assessment in the decision to indicate surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.03.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Pinillos Marambaia, Manuela Garcia Lima, Hélder Macário, Amaury de Machado Gomes, Leonado Marques Gomes, Melina Pinillos Marambaia, Otávio Marambaia dos Santos |
| Abstract |
Quality-of-life questionnaires have been used to support decision-making in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis in the past decade. The choice of treatment in practice, however, also considers the patient's decision. To assess the long-term quality of life of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who decided to avoid surgery. This is a prospective longitudinal study with a group of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, with and without indication for surgery, with application of the questionnaire SNOT-22 in two periods: between 2011 and 2012 and between June and August 2016, via email. Data were collected from 42 patients, of which 13 presented indications for surgery and 29 were not indicated for surgery. The average quality of life score was 42.1 (±16.4) in the group with an indication for surgery and 40.6 (±23.4) in the group without this indication, p=0.84. All the patients were assessed by a single doctor with blinding in relation to the initial score. No differences were detected between the groups. The impact of the chronic rhinosinusitis was reduced even among the patients with the indication for surgery. Both groups scored over 40. This study can help predict the impact of the chronic rhinosinusitis over time and better adjust expectations with non-surgical treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,416,577
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#41
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,750
of 340,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.