↓ Skip to main content

A morphological classification for vocal fold leukoplakia

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A morphological classification for vocal fold leukoplakia
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Chen, Changjiang Li, Yue Yang, Lei Cheng, Haitao Wu

Abstract

There is still no general method for discriminating between benign and malignant leukoplakia and identifying vocal fold leukoplakia. To evaluate the reliability of a morphological classification and the correlation between morphological types and pathological grades of vocal fold leukoplakia. A total of 375 patients with vocal fold leukoplakia between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Two observers divided the vocal fold leukoplakia into flat and smooth, elevated and smooth, and rough type on the basis of morphological appearance. The inter-observer reliability was evaluated and the results of classification from both observers were compared with final pathological grades. Clinical characteristics between low risk and high risk group were also analyzed. The percentage inter-observer agreement of the morphological classification was 78.7% (κ=0.615, p<0.001). In the results from both observers, the morphological types were significantly correlated with the pathological grades (p1<0.001, p2<0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test; r1=0.646, p1<0.001, r2=0.539, p2<0.001, Spearman Correlation Analysis). Multivariate analysis showed patient's age (p=0.018), the size of lesion (p<0.001), and morphological type (p<0.001) were significantly different between low risk group and high risk group. Combined receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of significant parameters revealed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.863 (95% CI 0.823-0.903, p<0.001). The proposed morphological classification of vocal fold leukoplakia was consistent between observers and morphological types correlated with pathological grades. Patient's age, the size of lesion, and morphological type might enable risk stratification and provide treatment guidelines for vocal fold leukoplakia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#359
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,472
of 341,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.