You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissociation between video head impulse test and caloric test: a marker of menière's disease? – A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101279 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonas Belchior Tamanini, Raquel Mezzalira, Maria Gabriela Bonilha Vallim, Guilherme Paiva Gabriel, Guita Stoler, Carlos Takahiro Chone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,029,146
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#34
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,097
of 387,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.