↓ Skip to main content

Sialendoscopy for treatment of major salivary glands diseases: a comprehensive analysis of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sialendoscopy for treatment of major salivary glands diseases: a comprehensive analysis of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, July 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Kallas-Silva, Maria Fernanda Dias Azevedo, Fátima Cristina Mendes de Matos, Silvia Picado Petrarrolha, Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis, Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar, Leandro Luongo Matos

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,761,242
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#102
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,301
of 364,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.