↓ Skip to main content

Impacto de un modelo de capacitación de la prueba Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil en la atención primaria

Overview of attention for article published in Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacto de un modelo de capacitación de la prueba Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil en la atención primaria
Published in
Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bmhimx.2015.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba, Ismael Delgado-Ginebra, Leopoldo Alfonso Cruz-Ortiz, César Iván Baqueiro-Hernández, Itzamara Jacqueline Martain-Pérez, Josuha Alexander Palma-Tavera, Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever, Hortensia Reyes-Morales, Gabriel O'Shea-Cuevas, Daniel Aceves-Villagrán, Joaquín Carrasco-Mendoza, Fátima Adriana Antillón-Ocampo, Víctor Manuel Villagrán-Muñoz, Elizabeth Halley-Castillo, Guillermo Vargas-López, Onofre Muñoz-Hernández

Abstract

The Child Development Evaluation (CDE) Test is a screening tool designed and validated in Mexico for the early detection of child developmental problems. For professionals who will be administering the test in primary care facilities, previous acquisition of knowledge about the test is required in order to generate reliable results. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of a training model for primary care workers from different professions through the comparison of knowledge acquired during the training course. The study design was a before/after type considering the participation in a training course for the CDE test as the intervention. The course took place in six different Mexican states from October to December 2013. The same questions were used before and after. There were 394 participants included. Distribution according to professional profile was as follows: general physicians 73.4%, nursing 7.7%, psychology 7.1%, nutrition 6.1% and other professions 5.6%. The questions with the lowest correct answer rates were associated with the scoring of the CDE test. In the initial evaluation, 64.9% obtained a grade lower than 20 compared with 1.8% in the final evaluation. In the initial evaluation only 1.8% passed compared with 75.15% in the final evaluation. The proposed model allows the participants to acquire general knowledge about the CDE Test. To improve the general results in future training courses, it is required to reinforce during training the scoring and interpretation of the test together with the previous lecture of the material by the participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 18 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Engineering 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 38%