↓ Skip to main content

Cánceres de intervalo y sensibilidad de los programas poblacionales de cribado de cáncer colorrectal

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cánceres de intervalo y sensibilidad de los programas poblacionales de cribado de cáncer colorrectal
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xènia Domènech, Montse Garcia, Llúcia Benito, Gemma Binefa, Carmen Vidal, Núria Milà, Víctor Moreno

Abstract

To describe interval cancers (IC) and the sensitivity of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes. A systematic review of the literature was conducted through a MEDLINE (PubMed) search. The search strategy combined the terms 'interval cancer', 'false negative', 'mass screening', 'screening' 'early detection of cancer', 'colorectal cancer' and 'bowel cancer'. Inclusion criteria consisted of population-based screening programmes, original articles written in English or Spanish and publication dates between 1999/01/01 and 2015/02/28. A narrative synthesis of the included articles was performed detailing the characteristics of the screening programmes, the IC rate, and the information sources used in each study. Thirteen articles were included. The episode sensitivity of CRC screening programmes ranged from 42.2% to 65.3% in programmes using the guaiac test and between 59.1% and 87.0% with the immunochemical test. We found a higher proportion of women who were diagnosed with IC and these lesions were mainly located in the proximal colon. There is wide variability in the IC rate in CRC programmes. To ensure comparability between programmes, there is a need for consensus on the working definition of IC and the methods used for their identification and quantification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 42%