Title |
Cómo evaluar y reducir desigualdades sociales en los programas de cribado de cáncer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gaceta Sanitaria, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.01.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gemma Binefa, Montse García, Rosana Peiró, Ana Molina-Barceló, Raquel Ibáñez, en nombre de los participantes de cribado de del encuentro «¿Cómo reducir las desigualdades sociales en los programas cáncer?» |
Abstract |
This field note presents the conclusions and recommendations made at the meeting 'How to reduce social inequalities in cancer screening programmes?' held at the XXVI School of Public Health of Mahon (Menorca, Spain). Participants developed recommendations based on experiences of population-based screening programmes (breast and colorectal) and opportunistic screening (cervical). The conclusions and recommendations focused on four main areas (information systems, evaluation and quality, research, and interventions): the inclusion of social variables at an individual level in health information systems; the establishment of minimum standards for gathering information regarding inequalities in access to preventive services; the performance of actions in vulnerable populations; and the promotion of the exchange of experiences and best practices through the Cancer Screening Programmes Network and working groups of the scientific societies. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 25% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |