↓ Skip to main content

Responsabilidad por pérdida de oportunidad asistencial en patología oncológica maligna en la medicina pública española

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responsabilidad por pérdida de oportunidad asistencial en patología oncológica maligna en la medicina pública española
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Sardinero-García, Andrés Santiago-Sáez, M Del Carmen Bravo, Bernardo Perea-Pérez, M Elena Albarrán-Juan, Elena Labajo-González, Julián Benito-León

Abstract

The loss of chance in healthcare has been forcibly introduced in the adjudications pronounced in recent years. Our objective was to analyse the verdicts of guilt resulting from the loss of chance ordered by the Contentious-Administrative Court (i.e., in the public healthcare system), in which both the origin of the disease to be treated and the sequelae were oncological processes. We analysed 137 cancer-related court judgments from the Contentious-Administrative Court, which referred to the concept of loss of chance, issued in Spain up to May 2014. Of the 137 sentences, 119 (86.9%), were pronounced due to diagnostic error and 14 (10.2%) due to inadequate treatment. Since 2010, 100 sentences have been passed (73.0%), representing an increase of more than 170% with respect to the 37 (27.0%) ordered in the first six years of the study (from 2004 to 2009). Most of the patients (68.6%) died, predominantly from breast cancer and gynaecological cancer (24.1%), and gastrointestinal cancers (21.1%). These malignancies were the ones most often involved in the sentences. The litigant activity due to loss of chance in oncological processes in the public health care has significantly increased in the last years. The judgments were mainly given because of diagnostic error or inadequate treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%