↓ Skip to main content

Características del uso inadecuado de medicamentos en pacientes pluripatológicos de edad avanzada

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Características del uso inadecuado de medicamentos en pacientes pluripatológicos de edad avanzada
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.06.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Carlota Rivas-Cobas, Nieves Ramírez-Duque, Mercedes Gómez Hernández, Juana García, Antonia Agustí, Xavier Vidal, Francesc Formiga, Alfonso López-Soto, Olga H. Torres, Antonio San-José, en representación de los investigadores de Medicamentos en Pacientes de Edad del Proyecto Estudio sobre el Uso Inadecuado Avanzada

Abstract

To analyse potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in elderly polypathological patients (PP). Multicentre observational, prospective study of 672 patients aged 75 years and older hospitalised in Internal Medicine between April 2011 and March 2012. The Beers, STOPP-START and ACOVE criteria were used to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing and the results of PP and non-PP patients were compared. Of the 672 patients included, 419 (62%) were polypathological, of which 89.3% met PIP criteria versus 79.4% of non-polypathological patients (p <0.01). 40.3% of polypathological patients met at least one Beers criteria, 62.8% at least one STOPP criteria, 62.3% at least one START criteria and 65.6% at least one ACOVE criteria. The rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing was higher in polypathological patients regardless of the tool used. Given the high rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing in polypathological patients, strategies to improve prescribing adequacy must be developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Chemistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 41%