Title |
Desprescripción de tratamientos de larga duración con bisfosfonatos para la osteoporosis en atención primaria en el País Vasco
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gaceta Sanitaria, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.07.003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arritxu Etxeberria, Josune Iribar, Javier Hernando, Ignacia Idarreta, Itziar Vergara, Carmela Mozo, Kalliopi Vrotsou, Joaquín Belzunegui, Arantxa Lekuona |
Abstract |
To evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention to promote bisphosphonate deprescription after over 5 years of use (BF5y) in a health care organisation (HCO) in Gipuzkoa (Spain) and to compare it with the standard intervention in other HCOs in the Basque Health Service-Osakidetza. An 8-month follow-up study (results from before and after) to assess the impact of two interventions. All patients from Osakidetza receiving BF5y treatment (electronic prescription) in July 2013 were included. The standard intervention (9 HCOs) consisted of mailing a consensus statement on BF5y deprescribing and facilitating patient identifiers with BF5y prescription for review by the primary care physician. The multifactorial intervention (Gipuzkoa) also included a local consensus with leading specialists and training sessions in health centres. 18,725 patients were included; 94.7% were women. Standard intervention deprescribing rates ranged from 26.4% (Bilbao) to 49.4% (Araba), being 37.2% overall. The multifactorial intervention deprescribing rate was 44.6%, 7.4% (p <0.0001; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 5.4-9.4) higher than standard intervention. Changes to other treatments were less common with the multifactorial intervention, with a difference of 3.7% (p <0.0001; 95%CI: -2.2 to -5.2). Standard and multifactorial interventions are very effective in reducing unnecessary treatments with bisphosphonates. The multifactorial intervention is more effective than the standard one, although more complex to implement. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 9 | 56% |
Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 29% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |