↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral and neural correlates of emotional development: typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral and neural correlates of emotional development: typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana A. Porto, Magda L. Nunes, Charles A. Nelson

Abstract

To describe the main findings of studies of behavioral and neural correlates regarding the development of facial emotion processing during the first year of life in typically developing infants and infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers. Comprehensive, non-systematic review of the literature on studies about individual differences in facial emotion processing by newborns and infants over the first year of life. Maternal stress related to depression and anxiety has been associated to atypical emotional processing and attentional behaviors in the offspring. Recent neurophysiological studies using electroencephalogram and event-related potentials have begun to shed light on the possible mechanisms underlying such behaviors. Infants of depressed and/or anxious mothers have increased risk for several adverse outcomes across the lifespan. Further neurobehavioral investigations and the promotion of clinical and developmental research integration might eventually contribute to refining screening tools, improving treatment, and enabling primary prevention interventions for children at risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#185
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,817
of 315,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.