↓ Skip to main content

Is this child sick? Usefulness of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in emergency settings

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is this child sick? Usefulness of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in emergency settings
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Fernandez, Javier Benito, Santiago Mintegi

Abstract

The Pediatric Assessment Triangle (PAT) is a rapid assessment tool that uses only visual and auditory clues, requires no equipment, and takes 30-60s to perform. It's being used internationally in different emergency settings, but few studies have assessed its performance. The aim of this narrative biomedical review is to summarize the literature available regarding the usefulness of the PAT in clinical practice. The authors carried out a non-systematic review in the PubMed(®), MEDLINE(®), and EMBASE(®) databases, searching for articles published between 1999-2016 using the keywords "pediatric assessment triangle," "pediatric triage," "pediatric assessment tools," and "pediatric emergency department." The PAT has demonstrated itself to be useful to assess sick children in the prehospital setting and make transport decisions. It has been incorporated, as an essential instrument for assessing sick children, into different life support courses, although little has been written about the effectiveness of teaching the PAT. Little has been published about the performance of the PAT in the initial evaluation in the emergency department. In the emergency department, the PAT is useful to identify the children at triage who require more urgent care. Recent studies have assessed and proved the efficacy of the PAT to also identify those patients having more serious health conditions who are eventually admitted to the hospital. The PAT is quickly spreading internationally and its clinical applicability is very promising. Nevertheless, it is imperative to promote research for clinical validation, especially for clinical use by emergency pediatricians and physicians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 29 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 30 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#214
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,855
of 324,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.