↓ Skip to main content

STRONGkids validation: tool accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STRONGkids validation: tool accuracy
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2018.12.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Rolim Vieira Maciel, Eduardo Yoshio Nakano, Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho, Eliane Said Dutra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 78 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Unspecified 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 84 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#645
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,795
of 363,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.