You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low FODMAPs diet for functional abdominal pain disorders in children: critical review of current knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jped.2019.03.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Licia Pensabene, Silvia Salvatore, Rossella Turco, Flora Tarsitano, Daniela Concolino, Maria Elisabetta Baldassarre, Osvaldo Borrelli, Nikhil Thapar, Yvan Vandenplas, Annamaria Staiano, Miguel Saps |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#376
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,503
of 363,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.