| Title |
Pediatric patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units in Brazil: a prospective multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jped.2020.07.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa, Fernanda Lima-Setta, Gustavo Rodrigues dos Santos, Vanessa Soares Lanziotti, Roberta Esteves Vieira de Castro, Daniela Carla de Souza, Carlos Eduardo Raymundo, Felipe Rezende Caino de Oliveira, Lucio Flavio Peixoto de Lima, Cristian Tedesco Tonial, José Colleti, Ana Paula Novaes Bellinat, Vivian Botelho Lorenzo, Raquel de Seixas Zeitel, Lucas Pulcheri, Fernanda Ciuffo Monte da Costa, Fabíola Peixoto Ferreira La Torre, Elaine Augusta das Neves Figueiredo, Thiago Peres da Silva, Paula Marins Riveiro, Isabele Coelho Fonseca da Mota, Igor Bromonschenkel Brandão, Zina Maria Almeida de Azevedo, Simone Camera Gregory, Fernanda Raquel Oliveira Boedo, Rosana Novais de Carvalho, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Daniel Hilário Santos Genu, Flavia Andrea Krepel Foronda, Antonio José Ledo A. Cunha, Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa, for the Brazilian Research Network in Pediatric Intensive Care |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| Brazil | 7 | 15% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 54% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 109 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,433,612
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#19
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,119
of 426,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them