↓ Skip to main content

Clinical effects of oral motor intervention combined with non-nutritive sucking on oral feeding in preterm infants with dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical effects of oral motor intervention combined with non-nutritive sucking on oral feeding in preterm infants with dysphagia
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, May 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2022.02.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Li, Li Liu, Fang Chen, Li Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Lecturer 2 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 53 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 53 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#498
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,039
of 445,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.