↓ Skip to main content

La irrigación con levaduras incrementa el contenido nutricional del forraje verde hidropónico de maíz

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Argentina de Microbiología, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La irrigación con levaduras incrementa el contenido nutricional del forraje verde hidropónico de maíz
Published in
Revista Argentina de Microbiología, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ram.2015.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha H. Bedolla-Torres, Alejandro Palacios Espinosa, Oskar A. Palacios, Francisco J. Choix, Felipe de Jesús Ascencio Valle, David R. López Aguilar, José Luis Espinoza Villavicencio, Rafael de Luna de la Peña, Ariel Guillen Trujillo, Narciso Y. Avila Serrano, Ricardo Ortega Pérez

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irrigation with yeasts (Debaryomyces hansenii var. Fabry, Yarowia lipolytica YIBCS002, Yarowia lipolytica var. BCS and Candida pseudointermedia) on the final nutritional content of hydroponic green maize fodder (Zea Zea mays L.), applied at different fodder growth stages (1. seed-seedling stage, 2. seedling-plant 20cm, 3. during all the culture). Irrespective of the fodder growth stages at which they were applied, all yeasts tested enhanced the content of raw protein, lipids, ash, moisture and energy. The percentage of electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, sulphates, Ca and Mg) showed different responses depending on the kind of yeast applied; D. hansenii exhibited the highest increment in all electrolytes, except for phosphorous. We conclude that the addition of yeasts belonging to the genera Debaryomyces, Candida and Yarowia to the irrigation solution of hydroponic systems enhances the nutrient content of green fodder. This kind of irrigation can be applied to generate high commercial value cultures in limited spaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 25%
Other 10 9%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 46 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 29%
Engineering 16 14%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 47 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#166
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,230
of 279,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.