You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tipos de spa no reportados en nuestro país en Staphylococcus aureus de pacientes adultos de un hospital escuela, Santa Fe, Argentina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Argentina de Microbiología, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ram.2017.09.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Tomatis, María R. Baroni, María A. Mendosa, Alicia Nagel, Analia Mollerach, Claudia Alvarez, Maria Laura Zurbriggen, Sabrina Cristobal, Glenda Segovia, Emilce de los A. Méndez |
| Abstract |
Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen associated a different kind of infection. Molecular markers are useful tools to study microbial epidemiology. Twenty two methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 23 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) were studied by mecA gene, SCCmec cassette, Panton Valentine leucocidin (PVL) and spa polymorphism. The clinical data patients were analyzed. MSSA was prevalent in samples different from skin and soft tissue (SST) and in hospitalized patients, whereas MRSA in SST. SCCmec type IV was predominant, followed by type I. Low presence of PVL was found. In MRSA 11 different types of spa were detected, t019 was the most frequent and associated with outpatient, 17 types were found in MSSA and t189 was prevalent. spa t002 was present in MSSA and MRSA. We found 11 types of spa not reported in our country. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 42% |
| Mexico | 3 | 25% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Andorra | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Psychology | 2 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,181,833
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#10
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,977
of 450,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Argentina de Microbiología
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.