↓ Skip to main content

Hip salvage surgery in cerebral palsy cases: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hip salvage surgery in cerebral palsy cases: a systematic review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Carboni de Souza, Marcelo Valentim Mansano, Miguel Bovo, Helder Henzo Yamada, Daniela Regina Rancan, Patricia Maria de Moraes Barros Fucs, Celso Svartman, Rodrigo Montezuma César de Assumpção

Abstract

Imbalance and muscle spasticity, in association with coxa valga and persistent femoral anteversion, compromises hip development in cases of cerebral palsy and may result in chronic pain and even dislocation. Some of these hips undergo salvage surgery because of the severe impact of their abnormalities in these patients' quality of life. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to compare the results from the main hip salvage techniques applied to these individuals. The literature search focused on studies that evaluated results from hip salvage surgery in cases of cerebral palsy, published from 1970 to 2011, which are present in the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases. Although the results were not statistically comparable, this systematic review demonstrates that hip salvage surgery should be indicated after individual evaluation on each patient, due to the wide spectrum of presentations of cerebral palsy. Therefore, it seems that no surgical technique is superior to any other. Rather, there are different indications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 31%