↓ Skip to main content

What is the real angle of deviation of metacarpal neck fractures on oblique views? A radiographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is the real angle of deviation of metacarpal neck fractures on oblique views? A radiographic study
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.02.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur de Góes Ribeiro, Daniel Hidalgo Gonçalez, João Manoel Fonseca Filho, Guilherme Marques da Fonseca, Antonio Carlos Costa, Ivan Chakkour

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish an indirect, easy-to-use, predictable and safe means of obtaining the true degree of displacement of fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone, through oblique radiographic views. An anatomical specimen from the fifth human metacarpal was dissected and subjected to ostectomy in the neck region. A 1-mm Kirschner wire was fixed to the base of the fifth metacarpal bone, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the bone and parallel to the ground. Another six Kirschner wires of the same diameter were bent over and attached to the ostectomized bone to simulate fracture displacement. Axial rotation of the metacarpus was used to create oblique radiographic views. Radiographic images were generated with different angles and at several degrees of rotation of the bone. We deduced a mathematical formula that showed the true displacement of fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone by means of oblique radiographs. Oblique radiographs at 30̊ of supination provided the best view of the bone and least variation from the real value of the displacement of fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone. The mathematical formula deduced was concordant with the experimental model used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Mathematics 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%