↓ Skip to main content

Femur lengthening with monoplanar external fixator associated with locked intramedullary nail

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Femur lengthening with monoplanar external fixator associated with locked intramedullary nail
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.03.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrique Paradella Alvachian Fernandes, Danilo Gabriel do Nascimento Silva Barronovo, Fabio Lucas Rodrigues, Marcos Hono

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate that the lengthening technique of an external fixator associated with locked intramedullary nail is an efficient method that decreases the duration of the external fixation and improves the rehabilitation period. From January of 2005 to May of 2014, 31 patients with mean lower limb discrepancy of 5.31 cm were treated. The etiologies of the deformity were femur fracture sequelae, infection, hip development dysplasia, polio, and congenital short femur. The mean duration of external fixation was 2.47 months (external fixation index of 16.15 days per cm). The mean time for bone healing was 6.66 months (consolidation index 43 days per cm). Initial mean knee range of motion was -1° to 100°, progressing to 0°-115° at the end of treatment. The complications observed were incomplete osteotomies, hip subluxation, broken fixator, decreased knee range of motion, and need for locking screw removal. Femur lengthening with a monoplanar external fixator associated with locked intramedullary nail allowed for a shorter period of external fixation use, better protection for the regenerated bone tissue, and early rehabilitation with possible complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 46%
Engineering 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%