↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial fractures (RUST)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Antonio Silva de Azevedo Filho, Ricardo Britto Cotias, Matheus Lemos Azi, Armando Augusto de Almeida Teixeira

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra observer reproducibility of the radiographic score of consolidation of the tibia shaft fractures. Fifty-one sets of radiographs in anteroposterior (AP) and profile (P) of the tibial shaft treated with intramedullary nail were obtained. The analysis of X-rays was performed in two stages, with a 21-day interval between assessments by a group of nine evaluators. To evaluate the reproducibility of RUST score between the evaluators, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval was used. ICC values range from +1, representing perfect agreement, to -1, complete disagreement. There was a significant correlation among all evaluators: ICC = 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91). The intraobserver agreement proved to be substantial with ICC = 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.91). This study confirms that the RUST scale shows a high degree of reliability and agreement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 26%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Unspecified 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 4 15%