↓ Skip to main content

Understanding posterior meniscal roots lesions: from basic science to treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding posterior meniscal roots lesions: from basic science to treatment
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.07.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Serra Cruz, Marcio Balbinotti Ferrari, Leonardo Metsavaht, Robert F. LaPrade

Abstract

The variability of symptoms and the fact that they are not easily recognized in imaging studies make the diagnosis and treatment of posterior meniscal roots lesions a challenging task to the orthopedist. In recent years, a more precise understanding of the anatomy and biomechanical impair of the knee joint in these cases has enabled great advances in therapeutic approaches. Well-documented studies have shown that the repair of these lesions presents superior functional and clinical improvement when compared with meniscectomy. However, the progression of degenerative joint changes in the long-term still exhibits conflicting results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Sports and Recreations 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 33%