You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Val66Met Polymorphism at the BDNF Gene does not Influence Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Results in Children and Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.02.007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristian Patrick Zeni, Silzá Tramontina, Thamis Aline Zeni, Roberta Coelho, Gabriel Pheula, Julio Bernardi, Ursula Maldaner, Talita Lopes Silva, Angélica Salatino-Oliveira, Mara Hutz, Luis Augusto Rohde |
Abstract |
To assess the role of the Val66Met polymorphism at the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene on the performance of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder [juvenile bipolar disorder (JBD)] on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#708
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,843
of 291,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.