↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Childhood Stress on Psychopathology

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Childhood Stress on Psychopathology
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.04.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisa Brietzke, Márcia Kauer Sant’anna, Andréa Jackowski, Rodrigo Grassi-Oliveira, Joanna Bucker, André Zugman, Rodrigo Barbachan Mansur, Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan

Abstract

Advances in our knowledge of mental disorder (MD) genetics have contributed to a better understanding of their pathophysiology. Nonetheless, several questions and doubts persist. Recent studies have focused on environmental influences in the development of MDs, and the advent of neuroscientific methodologies has provided new perspectives. Early life events, such as childhood stress, may affect neurodevelopment through mechanisms such as gene-environment interactions and epigenetic regulation, thus leading to diseases in adulthood. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence regarding the role of the environment, particularly childhood stress, in the pathophysiology of MD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 371 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Student > Master 54 14%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 89 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 102 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 18%
Neuroscience 30 8%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 105 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#179
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,104
of 285,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.