↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of fibromyalgia: literature review update

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Rheumatology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
619 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of fibromyalgia: literature review update
Published in
Advances in Rheumatology, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia Pasqual Marques, Adriana de Sousa do Espírito Santo, Ana Assumpção Berssaneti, Luciana Akemi Matsutani, Susan Lee King Yuan

Abstract

The present study aimed to update the literature review on the prevalence of fibromyalgia published in 2006. A bibliographical survey was carried out from 2005 to 2014 in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS and SciELO databases and 3274 records were identified. Five researchers selected the studies, following the inclusion criteria: studies that obtained the prevalence of fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia studies in associated diseases were excluded. When screening by title and abstract, 2073 irrelevant articles were excluded. The full texts of 210 articles were evaluated for eligibility and this review included 39 studies, described in 41 articles. The selected studies were grouped into four categories: (A) prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population; (B) prevalence of fibromyalgia in women; (C) prevalence of fibromyalgia in rural and urban areas; (D) prevalence of fibromyalgia in special populations. The literature shows values of fibromyalgia prevalence in the general population between 0.2 and 6.6%, in women between 2.4 and 6.8%, in urban areas between 0.7 and 11.4%, in rural areas between 0.1 and 5.2%, and in special populations values between 0.6 and 15%. This literature review update shows a significant increase in fibromyalgia prevalence studies in the world. The new 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria have not been widely used yet and the COPCORD (Community-oriented program for control of Rheumatic Diseases) methodology has increased the quality of studies on the prevalence of rheumatic diseases in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 619 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 618 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 98 16%
Student > Master 79 13%
Researcher 38 6%
Student > Postgraduate 33 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 108 17%
Unknown 232 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 14%
Psychology 35 6%
Neuroscience 30 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 4%
Other 81 13%
Unknown 244 39%