↓ Skip to main content

Contaminación intradomiciliaria por material particulado fino (MP2,5) en hogares de recién nacidos

Overview of attention for article published in Revista chilena de pediatría, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contaminación intradomiciliaria por material particulado fino (MP2,5) en hogares de recién nacidos
Published in
Revista chilena de pediatría, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

René Mauricio Barría, Mario Calvo, Paulina Pino

Abstract

Air pollution by particulate matter (PM) is a major public health problem. In Chile, the study has focused on outdoor air and PM10, rather than indoor air and PM2.5. Because newborns and infants spend most of their time at home, it is necessary to evaluate the exposure to indoor air pollution in this susceptible population. To determine concentration of PM2.5 in the homes of newborns and identify the emission sources of the pollutants. The PM2.5 concentration ([PM2.5]) was collected over a 24hour period in 207 households. Baseline sociodemographic information and environmental factors (heating, ventilation, smoking and house cleaning), were collected. The median [PM2.5] was 107.5μg/m(3). Family history of asthma was associated with lower [PM2.5] (P=.0495). Homes without heating showed a lower median [PM2.5], 58.6μg/m(3), while those using firewood, kerosene, and electricity ranged between 112.5 and 114.9, and coal users' homes reached 162.9μg/m(3). Wood using homes had significant differences (P=.0164) in median [PM2.5] whether the stove had complete combustion (98.2μg/m(3)) vs. incomplete (112.6μg/m(3)), or a salamander stove (140.6μg/m(3)). Cigarette smoking was reported in 8.7% of the households, but was not associated with the [PM2.5]. Ventilation was associated with a higher median [PM2.5] (120.6 vs. 99.1μg/m(3), P=.0039). We found homes with high [PM2.5]. Residential wood consumption was almost universal, and it is associated with the [PM2.5]. Natural ventilation increased MP2.5, probably due to infiltration from outside.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 26%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Professor 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 52 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 20%
Environmental Science 22 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 51 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,523,781
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de pediatría
#54
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,723
of 353,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de pediatría
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.