You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnosis of infant synostotic and nonsynostotic cranial deformities: a review for pediatricians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrico Ghizoni, Rafael Denadai, Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Helder Tedeschi, Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral |
| Abstract |
To review the current comprehensive care for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and nonsynostotic cranial deformity and to offer an overall view of these craniofacial conditions. The review was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS databases without time or language restrictions. Relevant articles were selected for the review. We included the anatomy and physiology of normal skull development of children, discussing nuances related to nomenclature, epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of the most common forms of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. The clinical criteria for the differential diagnosis between positional deformities and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis were also discussed, giving to the pediatrician subsidies for a quick and safe clinical diagnosis. If positional deformity is accurately diagnosed, it can be treated successfully with behavior modification. Diagnostic doubts and craniosynostosis patients should be referred straightaway to a multidisciplinary craniofacial center. Pediatricians are in the forefront of the diagnosis of patients with cranial deformities. Thus, it is of paramount importance that they recognize subtle cranial deformities as it may be related to premature fusion of cranial sutures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 19% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#90
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,995
of 326,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.