↓ Skip to main content

Dizziness, Physical Exercise, Falls, and Depression in Adults and the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dizziness, Physical Exercise, Falls, and Depression in Adults and the Elderly
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, November 2015
DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1566304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira, Mariane Heckmann Wender, Andréa Kruger Gonçalves, Cíntia de La Rocha Freitas, Ana Maria Pujol Vieira dos Santos, Cristina Loureiro Chaves Soldera

Abstract

Introduction Dizziness is a symptom that can lead to falls, which, in turn, undermine onés independence and autonomy, leading to several comorbidities. The practice of physical exercise, however, can help prevent falls. Objective The objective of this study is to confirm the association between physical exercise, dizziness, probability of falling, and depressive symptoms in a group of middle-aged adults and seniors. Methods The authors evaluated subjects based on history, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and functional reach test. Results The sample consisted of 90 individuals with a mean age of 69.3 ± 6.8 years. The authors found that 37.8% had been practicing exercise, 33.7% had depressive symptoms, and their probability of falling was above average in the functional reach test. Conclusion The results of this study indicated an association between dizziness, exercise practice and depressive symptoms, indicating that physical activity is a beneficial factor for the aging population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Sports and Recreations 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,456,836
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#224
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,550
of 285,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.