↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency: A Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 670)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency: A Review of the Literature
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, October 2016
DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1593448
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arlindo Cardoso Lima Neto, Roseli Bittar, Gabriel Scarabotolo Gattas, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Marcelo de Lima Oliveira, Rafael da Costa Monsanto, Luis Felipe Bittar

Abstract

Introduction  Vertebrobasilar insufficiency is defined as transitory ischemia of the vertebrobasilar circulation. Dizziness, vertigo, headaches, vomit, diplopia, blindness, ataxia, imbalance, and weakness in both sides of the body are the most common symptoms. Objective  To review the literature regarding the three available diagnostic testing in patients with dizziness complaints secondary to vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI): magnetic resonance angiography; transcranial Doppler ultrasound; and vertebrobasilar deprivation testing. Data Synthesis  We selected 28 studies that complied with our selection criteria for appraisal. The most frequent cause of the hemodynamic changes leading to VBI is atherosclerosis. The main clinical symptoms are dizziness, vertigo, headaches, vomit, diplopia, blindness, ataxia, imbalance, and weakness in both sides of the body. Even though arteriography is considered the most important exam to diagnose the disease, the inherent risks of this exam should be taken into consideration. The magnetic resonance angiography has been widely studied and is a good method to identify and localize any occlusions and stenosis in both neck and intracranial great vessels. Conclusion  Each patient with a suspected diagnosis of VBI should be individually evaluated and treated, taking in consideration the pros and cons of each diagnostic testing and treatment option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 56 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 61 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,634,537
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#47
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,922
of 319,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them