↓ Skip to main content

Endolymphatic Sac Surgery for Ménière's Disease – Current Opinion and Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 648)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endolymphatic Sac Surgery for Ménière's Disease – Current Opinion and Literature Review
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, March 2017
DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1599276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria de Lourdes Flores García, Carolina de la Llata Segura, Juan Carlos Cisneros Lesser, Carlo Pane Pianese

Abstract

Introduction The endolymphatic sac is thought to maintain the hydrostatic pressure and endolymph homeostasis for the inner ear, and its dysfunction may contribute to the pathophysiology of Ménière's disease. Throughout the years, different surgical procedures for intractable vertigo secondary to Ménière's disease have been described, and though many authors consider these procedures as effective, there are some who question its long-term efficacy and even those who think that vertigo control is achieved more due to a placebo effect than because of the procedure itself. Objective To review the different surgical procedures performed in the endolymphatic sac for the treatment of Ménière's disease. Data Sources PubMed, MD consult and Ovid-SP databases. Data Synthesis We focus on describing the different surgical procedures performed in the endolymphatic sac, such as endolymphatic sac decompression, endolymphatic sac enhancement, endolymphatic sac shunting and endolymphatic duct blockage, their pitfalls and advantages, their results in vertigo control and the complication rates. The senior author also describes his experience after 30 years of performing endolymphatic sac surgery. Conclusions The endolymphatic sac surgery, with all its variants, is a good option for patients with incapacitating endolymphatic hydrops, providing a high percentage of vertigo control and hearing preservation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,671,717
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#9
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,450
of 310,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.