↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Methylphenidate on the Hearing of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effect of Methylphenidate on the Hearing of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, August 2017
DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1605367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Onur İsmi, Veli Yildirim, Yusuf Vayisoglu, Anis Togrul, Fevziye Toros, Murat Unal

Abstract

Introduction  There has been a sudden idiopathic hearing loss case presented after methylphenidate treatment in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Objective  This study was performed to reveal the probable ototoxic side effects of methylphenidate use in patients with ADHD. Methods  Thirty pediatric patients with ADHD were included in the study. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination scores, waves I, III, V absolute latencies and waves I-III, I-V, III-V interpeak latencies at the 80 dB nHL intensity after click stimulus auditory brainstem response (ABR) results were compared before and 3 months after methylphenidate treatment. Results  There were no statistically significant difference between pretreatment and posttreatment pure tone and speech audiometry findings and ABR results (p > 0.05 for all parameters). Conclusion  Methylphenidate can be regarded as a safe drug regarding ototoxic side effects. Additional studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up may be needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Psychology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,950,579
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#115
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,206
of 317,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.