You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two new species of deep water south Brazilian turriforms (Neogastropoda, Conoidea, Turridae and Cochlespiridae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo), September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.11606/1807-0205/2022.62.049 |
| Authors |
Luiz Ricardo Lopes de Simone, José Carlos Tarasconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,940,889
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo)
#7
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,182
of 432,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia (São Paulo)
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them