↓ Skip to main content

Tooth loss in adults: factors associated with the position and number of lost teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tooth loss in adults: factors associated with the position and number of lost teeth
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, December 2019
DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2019053001318
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valmir Vanderlei Gomes, Brunna Verna Castro Gondinho, Manoelito Ferreira Silva-Junior, Denise de Fátima Barros Cavalcante, Jaqueline Vilela Bulgareli, Maria da Luz Rosario de Sousa, Antonio Carlos Frias, Marília Jesus Batista, Antonio Carlos Pereira

Abstract

To evaluate the factors associated with tooth loss in adults from the position and number of teeth lost in the dental arches. This is a cross-sectional, population-based study with adults participating in the epidemiological survey of oral health of São Paulo in 2015. The outcome of the study was tooth loss, assessed by the proposed classification, namely: I) lost up to 12 back teeth; II) lost up to 12 teeth (including front teeth); and III) lost more than 12 teeth. A four-block analysis was conducted, supported by a conceptual theoretical model adapted for tooth loss. For the multinomial logistic regression, "individuals who did not lose teeth due to caries or periodontal disease" was used as reference (p < 0.05). Of 6,051 adults evaluated, 25.3% (n = 1,530) were classified in category I, 32.7% (n = 1,977) in II, 9.4% (n = 568) in III, and 1.9% (n = 117) were edentulous. Lower income and schooling, the perception of need for treatment and the last appointment motivated by routine, pain or extraction were associated with tooth loss, regardless of the classification. The negative evaluation of the dental service was associated with individuals who lost up to 12 teeth, both front and back. The presence of women and periodontal pocket were associated with tooth loss of up to 12 teeth, including front, and more than 12 teeth. Caries were associated with adults who lost up to 12 teeth, including front teeth. The proposed classification allowed the identification of differences between the associated factors. Thus, the need to consider such classification in future studies is evident.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 36 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 37 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#988
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403,810
of 473,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.