↓ Skip to main content

Episiotomy in Southern Brazil: prevalence, trend, and associated factors

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Episiotomy in Southern Brazil: prevalence, trend, and associated factors
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, April 2022
DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003908
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juraci A Cesar, Luana P Marmitt, Raúl A Mendoza-Sassi

Abstract

To identify and analyze the prevalence, trend, and factors associated with episiotomy in Rio Grande, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil. A single, standardized questionnaire was applied to all pregnant women, residents in the municipality of Rio Grande, who had children in local hospitals between January 1 and December 12 of the years 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 e 2019. Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were investigated, as well as the assistance received during pregnancy and delivery. Chi-square test was used to compare proportions and Poisson regression with robust variance adjustment was used for multivariable analysis. Prevalence ratio (PR) was used as effect measure. Among the 12,645 births that occurred in the five years, 5,714 (45.2%) were vaginal delivery. Of these mothers, 2,930 (51.3%; 95%CI: 50.0%-52.6%) underwent episiotomy. Over this period, the episiotomy rate decreased from 70.9% (68.4-73.5) in 2007 to 19.4% (17.1-21.7) in 2019. Adjusted analysis showed a high PR of episiotomy occurrence among women who were young (PR = 2.23; 95%CI: 1.89-2.63), had higher education (PR = 1.21; 95%Cl: 1.03-1.42), had a higher family income (PR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.10-1.41), were primiparous (PR = 3.41; 95%CI: 2.95-3.95), had prenatal care in the private sector (PR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.07-1.46), had oxytocin-induced labor (PR = 1.18; 95%CI:1.09-1.27), underwent forceps (PR = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.16-1.50), and whose newborn weighed 4,000 g or more (PR = 1.43; 95%CI: 1.14-1.80). Although the prevalence of episiotomy fell sharply within the studied period, its occurrence is more likely among women at lower risk of birth complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 17 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 17 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,625,468
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#77
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,930
of 445,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.