You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a small panel of SNPs to infer ancestry in Chileans that distinguishes Aymara and Mapuche components
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Research, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40659-020-00284-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo A. Verdugo, Alex Di Genova, Luisa Herrera, Mauricio Moraga, Mónica Acuña, Soledad Berríos, Elena Llop, Carlos Y. Valenzuela, M. Leonor Bustamante, Dayhana Digman, Adriana Symon, Soledad Asenjo, Pamela López, Alejandro Blanco, José Suazo, Emmanuelle Barozet, Fresia Caba, Marcelo Villalón, Sergio Alvarado, Dante Cáceres, Katherine Salgado, Pilar Portales, Andrés Moreno-Estrada, Christopher R. Gignoux, Karla Sandoval, Carlos D. Bustamante, Celeste Eng, Scott Huntsman, Esteban G. Burchard, Nicolás Loira, Alejandro Maass, Lucía Cifuentes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 17 | 45% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 71% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,319,710
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#9
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,943
of 388,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.