You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabiane F. R. Morgado, Juliana F. F. Meireles, Clara M. Neves, Ana C. S. Amaral, Maria E. C. Ferreira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 200 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 137 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 91 | 8% |
| Researcher | 83 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 7% |
| Other | 200 | 18% |
| Unknown | 323 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 177 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 137 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 120 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 6% |
| Other | 183 | 17% |
| Unknown | 360 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,520,469
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#143
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,353
of 422,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.