You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence of validity and reliability of the adaptive functioning scale for intellectual disability (EFA-DI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41155-020-00164-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thais Selau, Mônia Aparecida da Silva, Euclides José de Mendonça Filho, Denise Ruschel Bandeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#287
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,375
of 440,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.