You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluación comparativa de la modulación de antibióticos frente a cepas bacterianas de Escherichia Coli, Staphylococcus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Ciencias de la Salud, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.12804/revsalud13.03.2015.02 |
Authors |
Henrique Coutinho HDM, Sharlene M. O. Brito SMO, Nadghia Leite NF, Vivianne C. S. Vandesmet VCS, Maria T. A. Oliveira MTA, Gioconda M. A. B. Martins GMAB |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Revista Ciencias de la Salud
#86
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,060
of 386,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Ciencias de la Salud
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.