You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A luta pela constituinte e a reforma política no Brasil: caminhos para um “constitucionalismo achado na rua” / The struggle for the constituent and political reform in Brazil: paths to a “constitucionalismo found in the street”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Direito e Práxis, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.12957/dep.2017.22331 |
| Authors |
Gladstone Leonel Da Silva Júnior, José Geraldo De Sousa Júnior |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,717,448
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Revista Direito e Práxis
#24
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,690
of 318,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Direito e Práxis
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.