You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Redes de espionaje y conspiraciones durante el inicio del Sitio Grande. Montevideo, 1843
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.15446/achsc.v46n2.78220 |
| Authors |
NICOLÁS DUFFAU, MARIO ETCHECHURY BARRERA |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura
#135
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,348
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.