↓ Skip to main content

Desigualdades en la continuidad de la atencin ambulatoria de poblacin desplazada en Colombia, 2012-2013

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Salud Pública, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Desigualdades en la continuidad de la atencin ambulatoria de poblacin desplazada en Colombia, 2012-2013
Published in
Revista de Salud Pública, February 2017
DOI 10.15446/rsap.v18n5.53859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giana M Henríquez-Mendoza

Abstract

To establish inequalities in the continuity of outpatient care to displaced population diagnosed with depression. A cross-sectional study, based on clinical records, was performed during the period between June 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013, on population diagnosed with depression and reduced to displaced population. The odds ratio was used to associate the type of population with the outpatient care control by professionals, adjusted by sex, age, affiliation and region. The following information was obtained from 74 713 records: 3 149 related to displaced population and 71 564 to non-displaced population; non-displaced population had 24 % more ambulatory care (OR: 1.24 p<0.001; CI 1.10 to 1.39), and the advantage was greater when adjusting the information to data, based on affiliation to the health system. In the displaced population group, men had greater rates of outpatient care compared to women (OR:1.40 p<0.001 CI: 1.08 to 1.83). The disadvantage was also high for non-displaced women (OR:1.26 p<0.001 CI: 1.10 to 1.44). Although these results were obtained for outpatient care in mild and moderate depressive patients, severe depression was excluded; the first type of depression was diagnosed in 92 % of people. The performance record showed inequalities in the continuity of outpatient care and, despite the improvement of quality, its coverage is still incomplete. During the first year of the unified plan for the Health System, apparently, the coverage has not achieved to avoid by itself differences in care of displaced population. Improvement of records and interoperability is necessary for designing health policies with an equitable approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 24%
Psychology 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2017.
All research outputs
#17,376,384
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Salud Pública
#6
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,465
of 425,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Salud Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them