↓ Skip to main content

Descripcin de la microbiota bacteriana residente en el bioslido generado en la planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales San Fernando. Itag, Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Salud Pública, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Descripcin de la microbiota bacteriana residente en el bioslido generado en la planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales San Fernando. Itag, Colombia
Published in
Revista de Salud Pública, November 2017
DOI 10.15446/rsap.v19n6.67950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ángela J Arévalo-Arbeláez, Katherine Bedoya-Urrego, Felipe Cabarcas-Jaramillo, Juan F Alzate-Restrepo

Abstract

To describe bacterial microbiota in the biosolids generated in one of the largest wastewater treatment plants of Colombia. Using NGS technology, 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon libraries were amplified and sequenced. The Roche 454 FLX Titanium platform was used, while the V1-V3 and V6-V9 hypervariable regions were amplified and analyzed independently. Amplicon processing and bacterial classification were performed using the AmpliconNoise pipeline and the RDP Classifier tool. The analysis showed that the most dominant Phyla in the biosolids were Chlo-roflexi, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. The most dominant genera were Pseudomonas, Dysgonomonas and Proteiniphilum; however, the dominant group according in the V1-V3 variable region was Anaerolineaceae, which does not conform to the species described for this family. Pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella and E. coli/Shigella were not detected in the studied biosolid sample. In the biosolids samples analyzed, environmental bacteria involved in organic matter stabilization processes during secondary biological treatments and anaerobic digestion were predominant. One of the dominant species in this sludge is a novel species of the Anaerolineaceae group. At the time of the study, it was found that the anaerobic digester system was able to maintain pathogenic bacteria at very low concentrations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 25 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,131,813
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Salud Pública
#6
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,326
of 341,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Salud Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them