↓ Skip to main content

Terapia ocupacional en oncologa: experiencias en prcticas acadmicas y revisin de literatura

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Salud Pública, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terapia ocupacional en oncologa: experiencias en prcticas acadmicas y revisin de literatura
Published in
Revista de Salud Pública, January 2018
DOI 10.15446/rsap.v20n1.62227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga L Peñas-Felizzola, Eliana I Parra-Esquivel, Ana M Gómez-Galindo

Abstract

To inquire about the training of occupational therapists in oncology in a university program, and to identify updated literature as evidence for training and professional practice. Cross-sectional exploratory study, with a sample of 29 students of occupational therapy from the National University of Colombia. Systematic review of literature 2010-2015 on occupational therapy interventions in oncology. Results In the survey, less than a quarter of the students reported having received training on clinical management of this diagnosis, and on the intervention of the occupational therapist with such cases (24.1%). Little more than this percentage (27.6%), has had users with cancer in their academic practices. In the literature review no national publications were found, although there were unpublished products from Colombian universities. Fifty-four international publications were recovered, especially in rehabilitation, it followed by psychosocial and socio-occupational areas. The palliative care, the multidisciplinarity, the subjective experience of the patient in relation to the diagnosis and treatment, the humanized and integral care from the different areas of the therapeutic task and work with caregivers are considered as relevant issues in the oncological patient's approach. Reference points are made for the occupational therapy curriculum development and for professional updating processes, which are both competence of the academy and of the guild. It is important to intervene in cancer not only during, but in the preparation to treatment and subsequently with survivors. Professional publications should be encouraged, making sure they provide powerful evidence of the impact of occupational therapy and oncological rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 30 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#22,867,974
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Salud Pública
#9
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390,120
of 450,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Salud Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them